Dunno about that but that sure is nice ^^
As a consequence of the forum being updated and repaired, the chatbox has been lost.
However, you can still come say hi on our Discord server!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: zman9000 on 31, May, 2012, 10:22:33 PMQuoteUmm... what?I think we can all agree that Rockisftw doesn't get this topic at all.
Rock, I can't even tell what you're trying to say with that.
In fact i'm so confused that I almost feel like starting over.......
Quote from: leaf on 31, May, 2012, 12:28:44 AM
If it's a gas exerting pressure on a solid, perhaps? That said, rock's post greatly confused me, too.QuoteLeaf, whats with all de formulas O-o!Uh... I haven't really been using many formulas here. I've been applying principles that have formulas associated with them, but it's not like I've been throwing a wall of formulas at you.QuoteBack onto the spring/rigid discussion, if it were between two rigid objects <assuming they are rigid, not springs or waves>; from the point of contact energy would just be exerted in some form or the other, sound, light, heat, etc, unless the "unstoppable" "object" is coming from all sides. In which case, we have to make up something imaginary here..You can make the assumption of a perfectly elastic collision. No energy is lost. No sound, no heat, no light, etc, are released. The total kinetic energy is the same before and after the collision.QuoteIf it were based on a spring, the energy from an "unstoppable" force/object hitting the "immovable" object that acts like a spring, then the model would roughly equateI don't think you quite understand what a massless infinite spring of zero stiffness really means. While I'm sure you understand massless (m = 0) and infinite (its unstretched length is infinite), you may not understand what the physical meaning of zero stiffness really is.
=====>|<=====
Yet, due to the very nature of being a "spring" means that it isn't immovable, it merely redirects the force back.
A spring with infinite stiffness acts like a rigid body. It will perfectly resist deformation and directly transfer force from one side of the infinite stiffness spring to the other. A spring with zero stiffness, however, transfers no force. It is perfectly deformed, absorbing no energy in the process. Remember that formula you learned in physics for the spring force? F = kx? Or the potential energy of a spring? E = 1/2*k*x^2? Set k = 0 and see what happens to those. By setting the spring's stiffness to zero, it allows the sphere to collide with the spring and infinitely compress it, without transmitting any of the force to the cube. The sphere remains in constant motion the whole time, and never loses any energy or momentum. Then, since the spring is massless, even though it is being infinitely compressed, the center of mass of the object never changes, and is always located at the center of the cube.QuoteThe other idea of it being an object at Absolute Zero <0K> is plausible, because we have absolutely no idea how Absolute Zero works. Mostly everything that we know and can formulate theories on are based on the idea that 0K is impossible. If 0K is possible, then nothing is interacting with it.. <Is that the right word? Maybe I should say influencing instead.> and the object itself is only capable of interacting with others <E.G. Gravity and so forth>. At least, my thoughts anyway.The rest of this is all gibberish. I'm not even gonna try to make sense of it.
Whoever said something about
|======> <Infinity 1>
<====|======> <Infinity 2>
Minus the typing error, assuming the line is of the same origin; Where is the point of collision between the two forces? Don't they technically coexist? Based on the fact that this is also a mathematical equivilent, this graphed is either up or down the Y/X or a function, and if Inf. 1 is red and Inf. 2 is blue, its blue on the -infinity and purple on the +infinity. While coexistance is the word I used, there are probably more precise words, but you should catch my drift.
---
...however, I will admit, the "unstoppable object" exerting a pressure on the "immovable object" is an interesting idea. Congrats on coming up with that one, rock. If we assume the immovable object to be a particle of infinite mass in an inertial reference frame, we can define the "unstoppable object" as a hollow sphere of dynamic radius. The sphere is always a sphere (it cannot be deformed into a shape that is not a sphere), but it is possible to increase or decrease its diameter with infinite force. Since this is a pressure force, we can choose to have the sphere be compressed. Anything that is larger than the new diameter of the sphere will be crushed to fit within it. This sphere then crushes the immovable object. However, because the immovable object was already a point in space, it is impossible to compress it further than that. The sphere infinitely reduces its size to approach zero radius at the same point in space as the immovable object, but, because it is impossible to reach zero from a finite value, the unstoppable object never actually reaches zero radius. This process continues for eternity. The end result is that the immovable object never moves, and the unstoppable object never stops.
Quote from: Atrius on 30, May, 2012, 04:02:22 AM
For such objects to exist there would have to be zero transfer of energy when they collide with other objects. Based on this fact there are two possible scenarios:
1) After the collision both objects retain the same momentum, but it's direction is changed. The unstoppable object bounces off the unmovable object without slowing down at all.
Quote from: FrozenBlade on 19, April, 2012, 12:15:11 AM
Welcome to the forums. I'm Frozenblade, but you can either call me Momo or Takumi if you like. I hope you enjoy your time here. If you are interested in joining a clan, or want to know more about them, you should go here. http://forum.goldensunhacking.net/index.php?topic=630.0
I myself lead the Mercury clan, but you may join any of them, depending on your personal tastes.
I think that about covers everything, since KoP got the rules covered already.
Have a good time here. we hope you stick around.
Quote from: zman9000 on 21, March, 2012, 03:53:50 AM
Update: added "Sekirei" and "Nichijou".
Delayed review of "Bakemonogatari", "Sket Dance", and "Bleach" because of college, and I need to spend a good amount of time on bleach.
Next review to be posted: Steins;Gate (my faverate anime of all time right up there with Guilty crown)
Quote from: Tetsuya the Azure Blade on 25, December, 2011, 07:55:57 AMQuote from: besttp on 25, December, 2011, 02:24:46 AMIt's in Vale, aswell, after beating Sol Sanctum, that's how it is. And Prox song is different from Lalivero's.Quote from: Knight Of Purgatory on 25, December, 2011, 02:11:04 AM
@@Rock: i think lalivero's song is also prox's song
Is it? I think lalivero's song is the one you could hear in Bilibin before you heal Tret.
Lalivero also gets the normal town song after you kill the end boss, that's how it is.
Quote from: Tetsuya the Azure Blade on 23, December, 2011, 04:58:11 PMQuote from: Kide on 23, December, 2011, 04:31:05 PMThey'd beat the crap out of weaker sister together, first, and start fighting themselves. You can do that in a free for all, that how it is.QuoteThe other two sisters would kill her dead before she could even do anythingOnly if they teamed up. If this was going to be a free-for-all, they'd be helpless.
Quote from: Tetsuya the Azure Blade on 18, December, 2011, 06:39:56 PM
黄金の太陽 in, it's Golden Sun in Japanese.
Page created in 0.076 seconds with 15 queries.